A new study by Consumer Reports revealed that Uber and Lyft can show significantly different prices to different users even for ride requests made simultaneously for the same trip.
The investigation raised the question of whether prices can be explained solely by supply and demand conditions. The companies argued that pricing is determined by various factors.
Same route, same minute, different prices
Consumer Reports created virtual ride requests for 30 routes across the U.S. The organization also sent volunteers in Portland, Oregon, to request rides at the same time.
Another test was conducted around Phoenix. There, after accounting for discounts on Uber, prices ranged from $41.21 to $56.96, showing a difference of about 38%.
In the Portland test, 18 volunteers requested the same ride within the same minute, and prices again varied. On a route in Kansas City, Missouri, 29 different prices appeared for the same ride across 55 potential customers.
Companies' response
Uber and Lyft say pricing varies based on factors like supply and demand. Uber stated that the service operates in an open and dynamic market, and prices depend not only on the destination but also on the time of the request and surrounding conditions.
An Uber spokesperson said that prices change from second to second, making price comparisons difficult. Lyft said it does not segment customers into specific groups, and Uber confirmed it does not consider protected characteristics such as gender or disability.
The companies also suggested that Consumer Reports' tests may have artificially increased demand. Uber and Lyft did not respond to Business Insider's request for further comment.
Discount display also sparked debate
The study found that about half of the rides showed prices that appeared discounted. These screens showed a higher price crossed out and replaced with a lower amount.
Consumer Reports reported that about 11% of these discounts seemed to be based on inflated initial prices. Uber and Lyft said the crossed-out amounts were not actual discounts but comparisons to past prices.
Derek Kravitz, the investigative reporter who authored the study, argued that a reasonable consumer would interpret these as discounts. The study reignited the debate over price transparency in ride-sharing apps.