Kenyan President William Ruto strongly criticized the loan conditions of Washington-based institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Ruto stated that the extensive demands African countries face when seeking external financing lead to domestic policy interventions unrelated to the borrowed money.
Multilateral lending institutions have for decades provided developing countries with cheaper financing compared to commercial borrowing. However, this financing comes with reform commitments such as strengthening public financial management, improving tax collection and enhancing transparency. While supporters argue that these measures help funds be used effectively and reduce corruption risks, critics say they increase international lenders' influence over domestic policy decisions.
Ruto's criticisms
Addressing members of the African Trade and Investment Development Insurance (ATIDI) in June, Ruto said, "It's tough to go borrowing from people. They expose you to all sorts of things. Do this, go pass that law, what about sexual laws, do this, do that. Things that have nothing to do with the money you're looking for." This statement reignited the debate sparked by Kenya's recent $750 million financing package from the World Bank. The package mandates reforms in governance, public finance, climate resilience and social protection.
Bargaining power shrinks
Capital A Yatırım Bankası research director Churchill Ogutu said that as fiscal space shrinks, governments' bargaining power decreases. Ogutu stated, "As financing options improve, conditions become less stringent." He noted that Kenya's turning to alternative sources such as international bond markets reflects a desire to reduce dependency on conditional loans.
Social impact of reforms
Across Africa, reforms tied to international financing often include politically sensitive measures such as tax increases, subsidy cuts and spending controls. While lenders argue these measures are necessary for fiscal stability, critics say they raise the cost of living and put pressure on households struggling with economic hardship. Dozens were killed during Kenya's 2024 tax reform protests.
Expertise Global's general manager Wangari Kebuchi said that as budgets tighten, the first cuts are usually made to social sector budgets, and children bear the brunt as health, education and protection systems weaken.
Historical examples and contradictions
In 2023, Nigeria removed its long-standing fuel subsidy and undertook foreign exchange reforms; in the process, the naira's depreciation increased transportation and import costs. Ghana, following its 2022 debt default, took measures such as public sector hiring restrictions, wage controls and spending cuts. Critics have long pointed out that the Structural Adjustment Programs of the 1980s and 1990s weakened public services.
Standard Investment Bank research director Eric Musau said that concessional financing offers countries cheaper borrowing options and reduces dependency on expensive commercial debt. Musau stated, "By extending repayment periods and subsidizing interest rates, these facilities reduce the immediate cost of public debt."
However, Kebuchi pointed out the contradiction, saying, "There is a bitter irony: Citizens are asked to pay more taxes to finance health, education, water and social protection, and then they are expected to pay out of pocket for the same services because tax revenues never meet targets."
As debates continue, Kenya and other African countries are trying to strike a balance between financial support and national priorities.