In the summer of 1989, the retrospective of the recently deceased photographer Robert Mapplethorpe, "The Perfect Moment," continued as a traveling exhibition across cities in the US. The exhibition, which was shown without issues in Philadelphia and Chicago, became the center of attention when the $30,000 NEA funding provided by the federal government for the arts came under scrutiny as it was about to open at the Corcoran Gallery in Washington. Conservative politicians presented this support as if the government was endorsing Mapplethorpe's explicit photographs. The debate over the content of a publicly funded exhibition quickly escalated into a national censorship crisis. When pressure on the Corcoran Gallery increased, the exhibition was canceled. However, the show did not end there; the Washington Project for the Arts stepped in, took over the exhibition, and presented the works to the audience. This time, the exhibition received praise, but the conflict around public art funding was just beginning. Isaac Butler's new book closely examines this period and what followed. Butler explains that he directly observed the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s during his childhood and youth in Washington, DC. His mother was on the board of the Washington Project for the Arts, and at one of the board's first meetings, the decision to take on "The Perfect Moment" exhibition was voted on. According to Butler, conservative figures like Jesse Helms used controversial artworks that received indirect or direct government support as a tool of pressure. The aim was to spread the idea that public morality was collapsing and to reduce the budgets of such programs. The book covers not only the Mapplethorpe controversy but also the fight around Andres Serrano's photo of a small crucifix submerged in urine, "Immersion (Piss Christ)," warning labels on music CDs, and the works of David Wojnarowicz. Butler says the work holds personal significance for him, partly because of his commitment to the NEA. The author notes that the starting point of his book was not directly conservative censorship but was prompted by the postponement of the Philip Guston retrospective in 2020 due to Ku Klux Klan paintings. Butler argues that this decision was a form of self-censorship made on behalf of viewers who might be offended and that it led him to reconsider freedom of expression as a leftist value. This process also led him to the 1990 lawsuit filed by performance artists Karen Finley, Tim Miller, John Fleck, and Holly Hughes, known as the NEA Four. The artists took their rejected NEA applications, which were denied due to their provocative content, to the US Supreme Court. The court upheld the NEA's decision-making process; the institution later stopped funding individual artists to avoid similar controversies. Butler says that when he began his research in 2022, the passage of Florida's HB 1557 law, known as "Don't Say Gay," further focused his attention on freedom of expression and academic freedom. However, he emphasizes that the backbone of the book is a historical study, aiming to illuminate the past and understand this period in its entirety. The author describes the culture wars as a conflict history progressing in phases, taking the word "war" out of its metaphorical use. In his view, a conflict begins, sides emerge, and the outcome prepares the next crisis. Butler says we are currently in the "Culture War II" period, and his book tells the story of "Culture War I." Although the NEA still exists today, it has changed significantly after the debates of the 1980s and 1990s. Butler notes that small, artist-focused institutions like the WPA have found it harder to survive because these spaces have become more fragile due to the higher risk of scandals. According to him, institutions that retreat in the face of pressure often face bigger problems; in contrast, the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati's resistance in court against obscenity charges in 1990 stands out as a different example.